Science And Religion – The Results Of An Absurd Debate

The conflict between science and religion is typical, classical and also wrong. People take the debate between science and religion so extremely that one has to choose one side and hate the other. You see all sorts of absurd justifications on social media. And if there are many injustices, there are even more attacks on people of different faiths.

In case of a misunderstanding, there is always a loser. The same goes for people involved in the debate around science and religion, although the feeling of having lost in a debate may be subjective. In the end, it does not matter how many losers there are. No one is convinced and nothing has been investigated. No one changes sides or questions their original position.

The debate between science and religion

We want to show you some of the arguments that people use most in this debate. We will talk about the two sides of the issue that you can find in any forum or social media platform. Defenders of science claim that religious people are wrong about it because the information from holy books is not true. For example, those who want to argue against Christianity often point to the myth of creation. This myth tells how the first man was created by God and the first woman was created from the first rib of this man.

People who want to discredit those who believe in evolution point to the impossibility that man descended from a monkey. This absurd debate, born of misinterpretations, is one of the most common. While it is true that some do not understand evolution, other people take it literally and avoid metaphorical writing.

Another controversial topic in the religion is famous historical divr. Advocates of science, including defenders of religion, philosophers of names, chemists, physicists, and endless famous people who believed or did not believe in God. Some people believe that religious scholars are the best, others believe in atheism. But they only mention important people because they are important. They rarely talk about scholars who have made great strides in religion.

On the other hand, many consider science to be the religion of our time. And if that was not enough, religious people use scientific arguments to demonstrate the existence of God. Clearly, some arguments to prove or deny the existence of God fall apart without resolving anything at all.

This is how these debates should be interpreted

These debates lack reflection and thought. They only try to discredit the opponent. Debates that take place on the internet and not face to face give people more freedom to express themselves without filter. The supposed anonymity that the Internet provides makes the attack material more diffuse and impersonal. When someone criticizes a religious or scientific position, they are not attacking a particular person. They attack a general person or an idea. But these types of debates can address situations that people take personally.

This process promotes an environment where the arguments become more and more ridiculous and far from the topic. Science and religion are compatible and there are different attitudes that bring them together. Those who do not seem to be compatible are from people who focus on the debate without listening to the other side. Or the only interpretation they recognize is the one closest to the critique.

Modern attitudes to science and religion

It is important to remember that science is a method. You can think of it as a tool that helps us understand the world. But science is not perfect. The method is not perfect, nor are the people who practice it. Their conclusions may be biased or false. There are many aspects of life that avoid the scope of science. However, this does not mean that we must accept any old theory and fall victim to absolute relativism.

On the other hand, religion fulfills certain functions that people with a simplistic view of the world tend to overlook. Religion helps to unite people, relieve tension and fear of death, and encourages generosity and sharing. Sometimes religion is based on mistaken or false ideas, but they are not bad in themselves. What makes them bad are usually the people who interpret the religion in certain ways.

We cannot know and understand everything

The researcher, Carl Sagan, gave a practical example of how science is not capable of interpreting everything. The saga said that we must think of the world in two dimensions, where all inhabitants are flat squares. In this world, a ball suddenly appears. The inhabitants of the square could not see it because the ball flew in the air. But one day the ball landed on the ground, leaving a round mark. The inhabitants of the world could not recover from their surprise.

This story, as absurd as it may seem, helps us reconsider the idea of ​​unknown dimensions. We do not know everything, nor do we want to know everything. Therefore, it is important to think critically without discrediting those who think differently. It will help us avoid a ridiculous debate. Lack of respect only creates conflict and pushes people apart. Dialogue and understanding promote reconciliation and unity.